Verb meaning , Microroles , Coding sets and Argument types
# | POUR | Coding set | Argument type |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pourer | NP-nom & V.subj | A |
2 | poured substance | NP-acc | P |
3 | pouring goal | LOC | L |
Alternations
Alternation name | Occurs | Comment | Coded? | Derived Coding frame | Examples |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
U
|
NNever | Alternation is only possible with za-lit', which is the result of applying the Prefixal Goal-Instrumental Alternation to this verb's basic coding frame and obtaining the derived coding frame 1-nom za+V.subj[1] 2-acc 3-ins, which then participates in this alternation, making the instrument into a nominative subject. | n |
|
|
C
|
RRegularly | alternation involves different prefixation: za-lit' | y | ||
C
|
NNever | y | |||
C
|
NNever | y | |||
C
|
RRegularly | y | |||
C
|
RRegularly | Requires prefixation on verb to make it perfective: vy-lit' | y | ||
U
|
NNever | n | |||
U
|
NNever | n | |||
C
|
NNever | y | |||
U
|
NNever | n | |||
U
|
NNever | n | |||
C
|
MMarginally | y | |||
C
|
RRegularly | y | |||
U
|
RRegularly | n | |||
C
|
NNever | y |