Italian ita Wals

Variety Standard Italian
Family Romance
Region Europe (and Indo-European)

Contributors

2846535882

Michela Cennamo

University of Naples Federico II

2935822706

Claudia Fabrizio

Università G. Marconi, Rome

38 References

How to cite the Italian dataset  BibTeX

Cennamo, Michela & Fabrizio, Claudia. 2013. Italian Valency Patterns.
In: Hartmann, Iren & Haspelmath, Martin & Taylor, Bradley (eds.) 2013.
Valency Patterns Leipzig.
Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
(Available online at http://valpal.info/languages/italian, Accessed on 2017-11-17)

Data

93 Verb forms 21 Coding frames 20 Alternations (99.4% avail.) 813 glossed Examples

Comments

General comment

Italian is a nominative-accusative language, with some domains where the encoding of arguments follows an active and marginally an ergative patterning. The syntactic function of arguments is signalled by agreement and word order for the nuclear arguments of the clause, A and P. Recipients and other non-core and peripheral arguments (i.e., adjuncts) are expressed by means of prepositions.

Characterization of flagging resources

There are no cases, apart from a residual accusative and dative form for clitic pronouns, used, respectively, for core and non-core arguments (e.g., recipients, locative adjuncts etc.). Most typically peripheral arguments, i.e., adjuncts, are coded through prepositional phrases.

Characterization of indexing resources

Agreement is always with the A/S argument in simple tenses. In compound tenses there occurs split agreement when P is realized by a pronoun: the finite verb always agrees with A, whilst the past participle agrees with the pronominal P (ergative orientation). S always agrees with the finite verb in simple tenses. In compound tenses the past participle agrees with S if the verb is unaccusative, whilst it reverts to the unmarked masculine singular if the verb is unergative.

Characterization of ordering resources

Syntactically, Italian is an SVO language, characterized by pragmatic rigidity and relative syntactic freedom, with tension between the basic SV(O) order and a pragmatic principle, whereby focal P arguments occur after the verb (Bentley 2006: 363, 368-370, 2008 and references therein).

Source of the data and generalizations/background of the contributor(s)

Dictionaries, scientific literature, naturalistic written examples, constructed by native speaker linguists, the Online Corpus of Written Italian ItWac (Baroni & Kilgariff 2006).